|
Pencak Silat and the Expansion
of the Javanese Kingdoms
Rapid Journal Vol 5, No.1 (Book 15, 2000: 40 – 41)
© O'ong Maryono
www.kpsnusantara.com
Continuing our travel through time, it is important to pose to discuss
the Majapahit Empire, between the XIII and the XVI century, since this
was an important period of expansion for Malay pencak silat --which
as we discussed in the previous article flourished in the Sriwijiaya
kingdom of Sumatra. Centred in East Java, this empire required an art
of war and a well-fortified army to simultaneously preserve and expand
its territory by overpowering other kingdoms. At its peak, the Majapahit
Empire encompassed almost the entire archipelago, from the previous
Kingdom of Sriwijaya to Bali, Maluku and Sulawesi. If to maintain territorial
integrity the king formed ties through marriage, to protect the kingdom's
borders he waged war through the use of martial arts. Envoys were sent
from the capital to instruct local authorities in the art of war. Upon
completing their mission, these envoys returned to the capital before
setting out for other areas. In this way, the principals of pencak silat
spread from one region to another. There are even experts who have surmised
the self-defence of the Majapahit knights extended as far as Mainland
China, brought home by soldiers of Kubalai Khan after their defeat by
Raden Wijaya during the Singasari attack at the end of the Kartanagara
administration early in the Majapahit period, around 1292. (PB IPSI
1995:11; Hisbullah Rachman 1987:9-10; Sa-leh 1991:18).
There was, however, one area of Java which remained untouched by the
expansion of the Majapahit Empire, as its forces could not dominate
it --the Priyangan Kingdom in West Java. Because this kingdom existed
in relative isolation during the course of several centuries we need
to consider the possibility that the development of pencak silat in
West Java had its own, individual roots since initially it was not (or
barely) influenced by Malay styles of self-defence diffused by the Majapahit
Empire. This hypothesis is important in explaining the origins of two
primary sources in the development of pencak silat in Indo-ne-sia. In
the words of one cultural specialist:
According to the consensus of Pencak Silat leaders in
West Sumatra, the styles of Pencak Silat thaHit developed in the Minangkabau
region originated from a single source: from Pariangan Padang Panjang,
in Tanah Datar Regency.... West Sumatra or Minangkabau. This was one
of the main sources of Pencak Silat in Indonesia. Another key source
of Pen-cak Silat in Indonesia was West Java. It was in this region that
the famed Cimande style of Pencak Silat was to be found. Perhaps this
style was derived from other Pencak Si-lat styles in West Java. The
Cimande style along with other styles in West Sumatra... was frequently
referred to as the source of other Pencak Silat styles [in Indo-ne-sia]...
Because the Cimade style and styles originating from Minangkabau are
often cited as the source of other styles of Pencak Silat, it may be
that...[they] are the original source of pencak silat in Indone-sia,
which later, along with other styles, including those from other Malay
communities and from China, became the source of inspiration and imagination
for the creation of one form or style of Pencak Silat. (No-tosoejitno
1984:9-10)
The hypothesis that the pencak silat of West Java was
a primary style, which developed outside the influence of the Ma-japa-hit
empire, appears to be supported by epic literature. It is said that
according to the Sundanese song, Sundayana, the sentinels of the Sri
Paduka Maharaja Sunda kingdom exhibited great skill in the art of pencak
silat when they escorted Princess Dyah Pitaloka to Majapahit as a potential
bride for King Hayam Wuruk, and faced indignities that greatly affronted
their honour, (Soepandi & Atmadibrata 1977:45). In a battle that
ensued at the Bubat field (1346 M), the Sundanese forces fought to the
last drop of blood, using special pencak moves and various weapons,
Albeit the pencak silat styles employed in conbat were different, we
can still draw the conclusion that in Javanese kingdoms throughout the
archipelago, pencak silat served the same function: to defend, maintain
or expand territory:
[pencak silat developed] due to the frequent battles
between one group of people and another, in order to seize power and
domination. The leader of this subjugation was able to extend the realm
of his dominance into a kingdom. To broaden his domination and maintain
his grip on power over a kingdom, the art of unarmed and armed self-defence
grew. (Liem Yoe Kiong 1960:38-42)
Army troops were primarily required to have physical superiority
and spritual strength in order to subdue opponents with or without weapons
(Notosoe-jitno 1984:5-6). The greater their expertise and might, the
greater their status and position within the kingdom's hierarchy. For
officers, the main pre-requisite to raising their prestige and becoming
kinsmen of the keraton (royal palace) was skill in self-defence, since
at that time martial arts masters were essential as warriors and sentries
to safeguard the security of a kingdom. Thanks to their proficiency
in self-defence, the kingdom could be victorious, its people feel secure,
and their lives tranquil.
As an instrument of national security, pencak silat was naturally kept
secret, and taught only to those close to authority. The era of kingdoms
was of course a feudal one, with a layered social system that gave rise
to grades of language, customs and traditions according to one's position
in the pecking order. At its apex, there were kings--the reincarnation
of gods, who were surrounded by nobility. In the Hindu-Buddhist monarchy,
the nobility consisted of people related to the king, taken from the
Brahmin caste, which controlled religion, or from the warrior caste,
which had supreme power, including military authority. It was this elite
group that was allowed to study the art of pencak silat, in line with
their social standing. The higher their position, the greater their
knowledge of self-defence. If foot soldiers were taught only basic techniques
so they could obey their commander's orders, court officials needed
to understand war theory and strategy to be capable of leading troops
into combat.
As befitting its elitist character, pencak silat training grounds were
closed to the public. Martial arts were practised only at the keraton,
the residence of the royal family, or in a mandala , the place where,
in accordance with Hindu-Buddhist tradition, Buddhist monks and Brahmin
priests educated pupils and potential religious leaders, and taught
their dogma. The tradition of martial arts education in a mandala, as
an expression of the integral role of spirituality in self-defence,
is not unique to Indo-nesia, but exists also in India and China. The
Shaolin Temple in South China, erected by Bodhidarma in the 5th century,
is renowned even to this day for its martial arts skill. (Xing Yan 1995).
Once again, the impact of interaction with other countries in Asia on
the growth of pencak silat is undeniable. It should be borne in mind
that the kingdoms of the Nusantara Archipelago had trade links with
several countries. Among others, the Majapahit Empire forged co-operative
ties with kingdoms in Thailand, China, India, Persia and Campa. These
relationships were not limited to trade but also involved scholarly
exchanges in the fields of art, education, religion and martial arts.
In particular, marital arts were brought by sentries who came on voyages
to protect trade cargo. One self-defence expert from China, Liem Yoe
Kiong in his book on the growth of the art of silat in Indo-ne-sia,
chronicles the influence merchants had during the centuries of large
vessel trade to and from China. According to Liem, during voyages Chinese
merchants were often attacked by pirates who wished to seize their valuable
cargoes. To defend themselves, these merchants brought along martial
arts masters from mainland China. Upon arrival in the archipelago, they
accompanied their bosses who were trading their wares to a number of
outlying regions, using indigenous coolies to bear the goods. Along
the way, the bodyguards provided self-defence instruction to the coolies
so if local robbers attacked them the coolies would be able to assist
them in warding off these foes. This brought about the widespread dissemination
of Chinese silat in Indonesia (Liem Yoe Kiong 1960:57).
It is interesting to note that according to Lim Yoe Ki-ong (Ibid:57-58),
the spread of Chinese martial arts occurred among the common people,
who in fact as previously mentioned, had no access to pencak silat,
as its practice was controlled by the nobility. What was allowed to
grow and develop amongst the general public was only the pen-cak silat
art, a form of pencak silat whose purpose was not to defend or attack,
but rather to express beauty. Because the pencak silat art had no strategic
military value, there was no need to keep it secret and it could be
studied by the public at large. Especially during times of peace, when
the need for defence was not particularly urgent, pencak silat as an
art became a widespread form of public recreation. Pencak silat dances
were performed at various events, including royal welcoming ceremonies
in Sumatra, wedding receptions in Jayakarta (Jakarta's name at that
time), and in Riau at harvest thanksgiving parties. In these traditional
ceremonies, pencak silat also had a ritual meaning as a means to make
humans stronger so that they could control and dominate their immediate
environment. Other than its artistic symbolism, the fine art of pen-cak
silat was also a source of enjoyments for enthusiasts. The pesilat's
movements, which followed the beat of a drum in rhythmic patterns, pleased
the senses of the audience and deeply touched the subconscious
So, although during the age of kings the emphasis was on pencak silat
as self-defence-in accordance with the kingdom's military need to maintain
and expand itself-during the same period pencak silat as an art met
the aesthetical and ritual needs of society at large. Besides these
two roles, over the following century pencak silat would acquire a new
function as the nobility lost its exclusive control over pencak silat.
As we will see in the next article, during the era of Islamic kingdoms,
pencak silat would develop into humanistic education.
References:
1. Hisbullah Rachman, Sejarah Perkembangan Pencak Silat di Indonesia,
Working paper 1987.
2. Liem You Kiong, Ilmu Silat . Sedjarah, Theorie dan Practijk, Malang
cv Penjebar 1960.
3. Notosoejitno, Pencak Silat Nilai dan perkembangannya, stencil 1984.
4. O'ong Maryono, Acculturation at the Core of Penacak Silat, Rapaid
Journal. Vol.4 No 4: 40-41, 2000.
5. Saleh M, Pencak Silat (Sejarah Perkembangan , Empat Aspek, Pembentukan
Sikap dan Gerak) Bandung: IKIP 1991.
6. Soepandi, A. & Atmadibrata,E. Khasanah Kesenian Daerah Jawa Barat
. Bandung : Pelita Masa 1977
7. Xing Yan , Shaolin Kungfu. Beijing: China Pictorial 1995 .
back
to main page back to articles
from Rapid Journal next article
(article 6)
|